MUNICIPAL ENTITIES REPORT UNIFICATION FOR ASSESSING THE INCLUSIVE EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT AND MUNICIPALITIES RATING CALCULATION: METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH

Authors

Keywords:

Inclusive education, municipalities, municipal reporting, reporting unification, rating assessment, children with disabilities, psychological and pedagogical support, inclusive culture, resource support, monitoring

Abstract

Introduction. The current public policy in the Russian Federation actively supports the development of inclusive education, regarding it as a crucial element in reforming the entire education system. However, the lack of universal tools for recording and monitoring the inclusiveness of the educational environment in the regions across municipalities complicates its assessment and comparison.

This article examines approaches to standardizing management reporting for municipalities to analyze and monitor the development of an inclusive educational environment. It describes the key indicators used to rank municipalities. It also presents a methodology for collecting data by municipalities and an algorithm for processing it for analysis across municipalities. The results confirm the relevance of standardizing reporting as a mechanism for increasing the transparency and manageability of inclusive education development processes at the level of municipalities and the regional Ministry of Education.

Materials and methods. The study aimed at optimizing the efforts of municipal education departments in compiling reports on the implementation of inclusive education development activities in the region, as well as to optimize the efforts of the Department of Special Education of the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Bashkortostan in processing and analyzing reports received from municipalities. This article provides a methodology for developing management reporting (at the regional level of the Russian Federation) and presents a method for processing data collected using the mode developed by the authors at the municipal level. The study included the following stages:

– systematization of indicators collected by municipalities as part of their 2024 reporting on the implementation of the Comprehensive Action Plan for the Development of Inclusive General and Supplementary Education, Children's Recreation, and the Creation of Special Conditions for Students with Disabilities for the Long-Term (until 2030), including the action plan ("roadmap") for implementing the Concept for the Development of Inclusive Education in the Republic of Bashkortostan;

– design of a municipal reporting model;

– design of an algorithm for collecting and processing data collected according to the new municipal reporting model;

– development of a methodology for calculating municipal ratings based on the level of development of an inclusive educational environment and ranking municipalities based on this rating.

The indicators for the reporting template and the calculation of the inclusive educational environment development rating were selected based on the criteria of relevance, measurability, and comparability. This ensures the accuracy of the study objectives, eliminates uncertainties, and enables cross-regional comparison, as well as intra-regional analysis of the development of inclusive educational environments over time. The study ed methods of data analysis, comparison of international and regional experience, formalized reporting forms, expert assessment, and classification and ranking procedures.

Results and conclusions. The methodology enables the identification of territorial disparities and the development of targeted management decisions. Key innovations include the integration of quantitative and qualitative indicators to determine the development of inclusive educational environments at the municipal level, consideration of international data standardization practices, and a mechanism for cross-municipal comparison.

The creation of a standardized reporting tool for municipalities will enable the assessment of progress in the development of inclusive educational environments, the formation of municipal rankings, and the effective allocation of resources to support children with special needs.

Discussion. The 2026 upcoming pilot developed reporting model verification, analytical forms, and methodologies for calculating the rating of municipal entities in the Republic of Bashkortostan will aim at determining the effectiveness of the implementation of the Comprehensive Action Plan for the development of inclusive general and additional education, children's recreation, and the creation of special conditions for students with disabilities until 2030.

Determining the feasibility of the proposed approaches and methods for assessing the development of inclusive education not only within the Republic of Bashkortostan but also their potential application in other regions of the Russian Federation requires comprehensive study and detailed analysis of the pilot project's results, followed by a discussion of possible ways to replicate the positive experience.

Received: 25 July 2025 · Revised: 25 August 2025 · Accepted: 17 November 2025

Agencies

The study was carried out within the framework of the state assignment of the Center for the Study of Social Development of the Region of the Institute of Strategic Studies of the Bashkortostan Republic Academy of Sciences 2024.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Anna V. Stol , Institute for Strategic Studies of the Republic of Bashkortostan

    Anna V. Stol – Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor; Institute for Strategic Studies of the Republic of Bashkortostan, (450008, Russia, Ufa, Kirova St., 15) – Leading Researcher at the Center for the Study of Social Development of the Region; stolav@isi-rb.ru. SPIN 6643-9050, ORCID 0000-0002-9528-2893.

  • Zukhra F. Garipova , Institute for Strategic Studies of the Republic of Bashkortostan

    Zukhra F. Garipova – Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor; Institute for Strategic Studies of the Republic of Bashkortostan, (450008, Russia, Ufa, Kirova St., 15) – Leading Researcher at the Center for the Study of Social Development of the Region; stolav@isi-rb.ru. SPIN 6152-8308, ORCID 0000-0002-0069-575Х.

References

Фальковская Л. П. О государственном регулировании развития инклюзивного образования и создания

специальных условий для обучения детей с ограниченными возможностями здоровья в Российской

Федерации // Психологическая наука и образование. 2024. Т. 29. № 5. С. 5–13. DOI 10.17759/

pse.2024290501. EDN KSKDTJ.

Мартысевич С. В. Доступность образования и механизмы ее достижения в России // Cifra. Педагогика.

2024. № 1 (3). DOI 10.18454/PED.2024.3.3. EDN ACETST.

Шарафутдинов Р. И., Измайлова Д. О., Ахметшин Э. М. Исследование национальных ключевых показателей эффективности инклюзивного роста и развития регионов Российской Федерации // Теоретическая и прикладная экономика. 2018. № 3. С. 118–134.

DOI 10.25136/2409-8647.2018.3.27061. EDN YAJHFR.

Петрович О. Г. Система мониторинговых исследований условий обучения лиц с ОВЗ и инвалидностью:

опыт института развития образования // Вестник Саратовского областного института развития образования. 2020. № 1. С. 33–41. EDN LBOKMW.

Самсонова Е. В., Быстрова Ю. А., Мануйлова В. В. Актуальное состояние инклюзивной образовательной

среды в профессиональных образовательных организациях среднего профессионального образования:

пилотное исследование // Клиническая и специальная психология. 2023. Т. 12. № 2. С. 192–214. DOI

10.17759/cpse.2023120209. EDN QMZCHP.

Keles S., ten Braak D., Munthe E. Inclusion of students

with special education needs in Nordic countries: a systematic scoping review // Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2024. Т. 68. № 3. С. 431–446. DOI

10.1080/00313831.2022.2148277.

Алехина С. В. и др. Федеральный мониторинг

инклюзивной образовательной среды организаций

общего образования: теоретическое обоснование

и возможности реализации // Журнал исследований социальной политики. 2025. Т. 23. № 1. С. 61–

DOI 10.17323/727-0634-2025-23-1-61-78. EDN

CTJFHL.

Mezzanotte C. Indicators of inclusion in education: A

framework for analysis // OECD Education Working Papers. 2023. № 300. С. 1–71. DOI 10.1787/d94f3bd8-en.

Rapp A. C., Corral-Granados A. Understanding inclusive

education-a theoretical contribution from system theory

and the constructionist perspective //International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2024.Т. 28. № 4. С. 423–439.

DOI 10.1080/13603116.2021.1946725. EDN AHBJPZ.

Kantavong P. Understanding inclusive education

practices in schools under local government jurisdiction: a study of Khon Kaen Municipality in Thailand //

International Journal of Inclusive Education.

2018. Т. 22. № 7. С. 767–786. DOI 10.1080/

13603116.2017.1412509.

Skotnicka B., Mrozek S. The Activities of Local Government Municipal Units in Shaping Inclusive Education in

Poland // Przegląd Badan Edukacyjnych (Educational

Studies Review). 2022. Т. 2. № 40. С. 329–348. DOI

10.12775/PBE.2022.030. EDN YPDFHJ.

Jahnukainen M. Inclusion in Finland: Myths and realities // Finland’s famous education system: Unvarnished insights into Finnish schooling. - Singapore:

Springer Nature Singapore, 2023. P. 401–415. DOI

10.1007/978-981-19-8241-5.

Глухих С. И., Уваров В. И. Региональные особенности

инклюзивного образования в России на примере Свердловской области // Педагогическое образование в России. 2020. № 4. С. 176–183. DOI 10.26170/

po20-04-22. EDN CTENBT.

Жаворонкова Л. В. Многоуровневое управление развитием региональной системы инклюзивного образования : специальность 58.10.00 : диссертация на соискание ученой степени кандидата педагогических

наук / Жаворонкова Лилия Викторовна, 2022. 277 с.

EDN YDTRSR.

Гарипова З. Ф., Халитова Л. Р. Концептуальные основы совершенствования механизмов управления развитием социальной инфраструктуры территории //

Микроэкономика. 2019. № 6. С. 40–46. DOI 10.33917/

mic-6.89.2019. EDN BPXUTP.

Арутюнян А. А., Кожина В. О. Развитие цифровизации

регионов Российской Федерации на примере г. Москвы // Региональная и отраслевая экономика. 2022.

№ 3. С. 6–11. DOI 10.47576/2782-4578_2022_3_6.

EDN MVUHWN.

Архиереева А. В. Финансовый рейтинг сельхозпредприятий // Аграрная наука. 2003. № 1. С. 18–19. EDN PKJBCR.

Столь А. В. Рейтинг обеспеченности социальной инфраструктурой как метод сравнительной оценки муниципальных образований (на примере Республики

Башкортостан) // Муниципалитет: экономика и управление. 2022. № 2 (39). С. 85–96. DOI 10.22394/2304-

3385-2022-2-85-96. EDN DUPDNE.

Самсонова Е. В., Быстрова Ю. А. Исследование возможностей ресурсной сети для развития инклюзивной образовательной среды // Вестник практической

психологии образования. 2023. Т. 20. № 2. С. 47–62.

DOI 10.17759/bppe.2023200204. EDN PUJVUZ.

Кропотова Н. В., Ибрагимова Э. Э., Фазилова А. Э. Комфортность образовательной среды в субъективной оценке старшеклассников (на примере

Республики Крым) // Педагогика. Вопросы теории

и практики. 2025. Т. 10. № 3. С. 292–303. DOI 10.30853/

ped20250036. EDN RLOCEA.

Falkovskaya, L. P. (2024) On State Regulation of the

Development of Inclusive Education and the Creation

of Special Conditions for the Education of Children with

Disabilities in the Russian Federation. Psychological

Science and Education, 29 (5), pp. 5–13. https://doi.

org/10.17759/pse.2024290501. https://elibrary.ru/

kskdtj.

Martisevich, S. V. (2024) Accessibility of Education and

Mechanisms of its Attainment in Russia. Cifra. Pedagogy, 1 (3). https://doi.org/10.18454/PED.2024.3.3.

https://elibrary.ru/acetst.

Sharafutdinov, R. I., Izmaylova, D. O., Akhmetshin, E. M.

(2018) Study on national key performance indicators

of inclusive growth and regional development in the

Russian Federation. Theoretical and Applied Economics, (3), pp. 118–134. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-

8647.2018.3.27061. https://elibrary.ru/yajhfr.

Petrovich, O. G. (2020) System for monitoring research

into the conditions of education for individuals with disabilities: experience of the Institute for Education Development. Vestnik Saratovskogo oblastnogo instituta

razvitia obrazovania, (1), pp. 33–41. https://elibrary.ru/

lbokmw.

Samsonova, E. V., Bystrova, Yu. A., Manuilova, V. V. (2023)

The Current State of The Inclusive Educational Environment in Vocational Educational Institutions of Secondary Vocational Education: a Pilot Study. Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 12 (2), pp. 192–214. https://

doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2023120209. https://elibrary.

ru/qmzchp.

Keles, S., Ten Braak, D., Munthe, E. (2024) Inclusion of

students with special education needs in Nordic countries: a systematic scoping review. Scandinavian Journal

of Educational Research, 68 (3), pp. 431–446. https://

doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2148277.

Alekhina, S., Samsonova, E., Alekseeva, M., Klimov, I.,

Davydov, S., Osmanov, T. (2025) Federal Monitoring of the

Inclusive Educational Environment of General Educational Institutions: Theoretical Rationale and Implementation Options. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 23 (1),

pp. 61–78. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2025-

23-1-61-78. https://elibrary.ru/ctjfhl.

Mezzanotte, C. (2023) Indicators of inclusion in education: A framework for analysis. OECD Education Working Papers, (300). pp. 1–71. https://doi.org/10.1787/

d94f3bd8-en.

Rapp, A. C., Corral-Granados, A. (2024) Understanding

inclusive education – a theoretical contribution from

systems theory and constructivist perspectives. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28 (4), pp. 423–

https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1946725.

https://elibrary.ru/ahbjpz.

Kantavong, P. (2018) Understanding inclusive education

practices in schools under local government jurisdiction:

a case study of Khon Kaen municipality in Thailand. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22 (7), pp. 767–

https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1412509.

Skotnicka, B., Mrozek, S. (2022) The activities of municipal units in shaping inclusive education in Poland. Educational Studies Review, 2 (40), pp. 329–348. https://doi.

org/10.12775/PBE.2022.030. https://elibrary.ru/ypdfhj.

Jahnukainen, M. (2023) Inclusion in Finland: myths and

realities. In: Finland’s Famous Education System: Unvarnished Insights into Finnish Schooling. Singapore,

Springer Nature Singapore, pp. 401–415. https://doi.

org/10.1007/978-981-19-8241-5.

Glukhikh, S. I., Uvarov, V. I. (2020) Regional features of inclusive education in Russia on the example of Sverdlovsk

region. Pedagogical Education in Russia, (4), pp. 176–

https://doi.org/10.26170/po20-04-22. https://elibrary.ru/ctenbt.

Zhavoronkova, L. V. (2022) Multi-level management of

regional inclusive education system development. 277 p.

https://elibrary.ru/ydtrsr.

Garipova, Z. F., Khalitova, L. R. (2019) Conceptual basis

for improving mechanisms for managing the development of social infrastructure of territories. Microeconomics, (6), pp. 40–46. https://doi.org/10.33917/mic6.89.2019. https://elibrary.ru/bpxutp.

Arutyunyan, A. A., Kozhina, V. O. (2022) Development of

digitalization the regions in the Russian Federation on

the example of Moscow. Regional and Sectoral Economy, (3), pp. 6–11. https://doi.org/10.47576/2782-

4578_2022_3_6. https://elibrary.ru/mvuhwn.

Arkhiereeva, A. V. (2003) Financial rating of agricultural

enterprises. Agrarian Science, (1), pp. 18–19. https://elibrary.ru/pkjbcr.

Stol, A. V. (2022) Rating of provision with social infrastructure as a method of comparative assessment

of municipalities (by the example of the Republic of

Bashkortostan). Municipality: economics and management, (2), pp. 85–96. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-

3385-2022-2-85-96. https://elibrary.ru/dupdne.

Samsonova, E. V., Bystrova, Y. A. (2023) Study of the

Possibilities of the Resource Network for the Development of an Inclusive Educational Environment. Bulletin

of Practical Psychology of Education, 20 (2), pp. 47–62.

https://doi.org/10.17759/bppe.2023200204. https://

elibrary.ru/pujvuz.

Kropotova, N. V., Ibragimova, E. E., Fazylova, A. E. (2025)

Comfort of the educational environment in the subjective evaluation of high school students (by the example

of the Republic of Crimea). Pedagogy. Theory & Practice, 10 (3), pp. 292–303. https://doi.org/10.30853/

ped20250036. https://elibrary.ru/rlocea.

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

MUNICIPAL ENTITIES REPORT UNIFICATION FOR ASSESSING THE INCLUSIVE EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT AND MUNICIPALITIES RATING CALCULATION: METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH. (2025). Municipality: Economics and Management, 4. https://municipality.owebs.ru/article/view/1728