REGIONAL INDUSTRY IMPORT SUBSTITUTION INNOVATION PROJECTS EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT

Authors

Keywords:

Regional differentiation, import substitution, innovation, advanced production technologies, efficiency

Abstract

Introduction. Import substitution has become a priority area of state development. Although the idea of developing domestic production to reduce dependence on imports is not new and was discussed back in the 2000s, its implementation was interfered by favorable conditions for foreign trade and the active presence of foreign capital. In the current political and economic climate, factors that significantly accelerated import substitution processes have come to the fore. On the government part, these include programs to support the key industries and protectionist measures. 2014 is considered to be the turning point, when external pressure became a determinant. It was then that large-scale systematic programs were launched, primarily aimed at strengthening food security.

Materials and methods. Unlike existing studies that rely on statistics, this paper considers the opinions of companies implementing innovations for import substitution.

The study analyzes two ways innovations influence import substitution: directly reducing import dependence and indirectly through expanding sales markets. The analysis is based on the primary statistical data from 2024: Form No. 1-Technology (for assessing import dependence) and Form No. 4-Innovation (for market analysis).

Efficiency has been assessed basing on organizations that have demonstrated significant impact from technology implementation. The study also takes into account the impact of sanctions on technology transfer. The analysis covers Russian regions.

Results and conclusions. The share of companies reporting an impact from import substitution varies by region, from 51.0% (Yakutia) to 15.0% (Chukotka), with a national average of 33.7%, revealing a significant territorial imbalance. Innovations demonstrate greater effectiveness in expanding sales markets (53.0% on average across Russia), but with significant regional variations – from 75.0% in North Ossetia to 14.9% in the Magadan Region. At the same time, the sanctions factor has a moderate impact: only 22.6% of companies nationwide consider restrictions a significant barrier. The Belgorod Region (32.7%) and St. Petersburg (32.5%) are most dependent on technology imports, while the Altai Republic (10.5%) and the Crimea (11.8%) are least dependent.

Discussion. The analysis of 2020–2024 shows that only a third of organizations report significant impact from implementing import substitution technologies. Despite growth, particularly in 2022, the current level indicates challenges in project implementation. Statistical analysis revealed no correlation between the effectiveness of import substitution technologies and GRP per capita (r=0.05), demonstrating the limitations of purely economic assessment methods. Market expansion shows stable trends with less pronounced regional differentiation, although Far Eastern regions consistently demonstrate lower results. Sanctions pose a significant barrier for no more than 25% of organizations (up to a maximum of 32.7%).

Received: 27 October 2025 · Revised: 30 December 2025 · Accepted: 20 January 2026

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Maksim A. Korkin , The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

    Maksim A. Korkin – Candidate of Economic Sciences; Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (119571, Russia, Moscow, inner territorial unit of the city, Troparevo-Nikulino municipal district, Vernadsky Ave., 82, building 1) – Doctoral Candidate; ma.korkin@yandex.ru. SPIN 5352-8165, ORCID 0000-0001-9059-5498.

References

Мартьянова М. А., Голубин А. В. Влияние импортозамещения на экономику России в 21 веке // Вектор экономики. 2024. № 12 (102). EDN XJOBYB.

Abdiyanto Muda I., Alsmady A. A., Darmawan O., Poetri S. A. Z., Harianja O. M. P., Tampubolon J. F. The Effect of Exports and Imports on Agribusiness Activities on the Development of Indonesia’s Economic Growth // Research on World Agricultural Economy. 2025. 6 (4). Pp. 547–557. 10.36956/rwae.v6i4.2034.

Clift B. Economic Patriotism, the Clash of Capitalisms, and State Aid in the European Union // Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade. 2013. 13. Pp. 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-012-0138-5.

Mutai N. C., Ibeh L., Nguyen M. C., Kiarie J. W., Ikamari C. Sustainable economic development in Kenya: influence of diaspora remittances, foreign direct investment and imports // African Journal of Economic and Management Studies. 2025. 16 (1). Pp. 61–78. DOI 10.1108/AJEMS-01-2024-0059.

Toai, D. B. The Effect of Exchange Rate Volatility on Vietnam's Import and Export Structure. Financial Economics Insights. 2025. 2. Pp. 62–70. 10.70088/cye65292.

Цыпин А. П., Попов В. В., Овсянников В. А. Рост иностранного капитала в сельском хозяйстве России как угроза продовольственной безопасности страны // Продовольственная политика и безопасность. 2016. Т. 3, № 3. С. 197–202. DOI 10.18334/ppib.3.3.36495. EDN YZKHDZ.

Лосева А. В., Федосьина А. В., Дуплий Е. В. Сравнительный анализ государственной поддержки сельхозпроизводителей в России и в мире // Управление. 2023. Т. 11, № 2. С. 25–34. DOI 10.26425/2309-3633-2023-11-2-25-34. EDN UYDSUM.

Nabilou H. Impact of US Sanctions and COVID-19 Pandemic on Iranian Economy // International Academic Social Resources Journal. 2021. 6 (23). Pp. 282–290. DOI 10.31569/ASRJOURNAL.105.

Ustiashvili Samin. Examining the Impact of Sanctions and the Aftermath of the JCPOA on Iran’s Economy // Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities. 2023. 2 (8). Pp. 19–31. 10.56397/JRSSH.2023.08.04. EDN IVMUYZ.

Беляев С. А., Зюкин Д. А. Снижение импортозависимости как один из параметров обеспечения экономической безопасности России // Вестник Курской государственной сельскохозяйственной академии. 2022. № 3. С. 181–187. EDN IAWZLV.

Попов В. В., Цыпин А. П., Овсянников В. А. Импорт сельскохозяйственной продукции как угроза продовольственной безопасности России // Интеграция науки, общества, производства и промышленности : сб. ст. Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. (Самара, 10 авг. 2016 г.) / отв. ред. А. А. Сукиасян. Самара : Аэтерна, 2016. С. 43–48. EDN WHJUOH.

Литвинова А. В., Логинова Е. В. Оценка импортозависимости российской экономики // Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Экономика. 2023. Т. 25, № 4. С. 17–29. DOI 10.15688/ek.jvolsu.2023.4.2. EDN SMYHWK.

Лакин А. А. Подходы к оценке инновационных проектов в рамках программ импортозамещения // Вестник евразийской науки. 2024. Т. 16, № 3. С. 17. EDN PPYXSG.

Хейфец Б. А., Чернова В. Ю. Система оценки эффективности и мониторинга результатов политики импортозамещения // Экономика региона. 2019. Т. 15, № 4. С. 1266–1278. DOI 10.17059/2019-4-23. EDN KFRYAH.

Моисеев Н. А., Ахмадеев Б. А. Алгоритм оценки импортозамещения на основе таблиц затрат – выпуска // Вестник Российского экономического университета имени Г. В. Плеханова. 2021. Т. 18, № 3 (117). С. 117–129. DOI 10.21686/2413-2829-2021-3-117-129. EDN UWPEOQ.

Борисов В. Н., Почукаева О. В. Метод оценивания процесса импортозамещения на российском рынке инвестиционного оборудования и его статистическое обеспечение // Вестник НГУЭУ. 2019. № 3. С. 94–108. DOI 10.34020/2073-6495-2019-3-094-108. EDN GZPDBV.

Митяков С. Н., Митякова О. И., Усачева Ю. В. Методика оценки импортозамещения различных отраслей промышленности // Экономика промышленности. 2013. № 4. С. 19–23. EDN RRUKGT.

Банников С. А. Управление предприятием в условиях цифровизации – целесообразность внедрения цифровых решений в зеркале статистики // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. 2024. № 6 (488). С. 190–199. DOI 10.47475/1994-2796-2024-488-6-190-199. EDN DIHCFU.

Амелин С. В., Савватеев В. А., Шендрикова О. О. [и др.] Методический аппарат оценки эффективности импортозамещающих инноваций // ФЭС: Финансы. Экономика. Стратегия. 2021. Т. 18, № 5. С. 44–50. EDN YNHVZK.

Цапенко М. В. Конструирование эффективных фронтов инновационных проектов // Онтология проектирования. 2018. Т. 8, № 4 (30). С. 605–614. DOI 10.18287/2223-9537-2018-8-4-605-614. EDN YSWNNB.

Martyanova, M. A., Golubin, A. V. (2024). The impact of import substitution on the Russian economy in the 21st century. Vector Economy, (12), article 14. https://elibrary.ru/xjobyb.

Abdiyanto, Muda, I., Alsmady, A. A., Darmawan, O., Poetri, S. A. Z., Harianja, O. M. P., Tampubolon, J. F. (2025). The Effect of Exports and Imports on Agribusiness Activities on the Development of Indonesia’s Economic Growth. Research on World Agricultural Economy, 6 (4), pp. 547–557. https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v6i4.2034

Clift, B. Economic Patriotism, the Clash of Capitalisms, and State Aid in the European Union. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, (13), pp. 101–117 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-012-0138-5.

Mutai, N. C., Ibeh, L., Nguyen, M. C., Kiarie, J. W., Ikamari, C. (2025). Sustainable economic development in Kenya: influence of diaspora remittances, foreign direct investment and imports. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 16 (1), pp. 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-01-2024-0059.

Toai, D. B. (2025). The Effect of Exchange Rate Volatility on Vietnam's Import and Export Structure. Financial Economics Insights. 2 (1), pp. 62–70. https://doi.org/10.70088/cye65292.

Tsypin, A. P., Popov, V. V., Ovsyannikov, V. A. (2016). Increase of foreign capital in russia’s agriculture as a threat to the country’s food security. Food Policy and Security, 3 (3), pp. 197–202. https://doi.org/10.18334/ppib.3.3.36495. https://elibrary.ru/yzkhdz.

Loseva, A. V., Fedosina, A. V., Dupliy, E. V. (2023). Comparative analysis of state support for agricultural producers in Russia and in the world. Management (Russia), 11 (2), pp. 25–34. https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2023-11-2-25-34. https://elibrary.ru/uydsum.

Nabilou, H. (2021). Impact of US Sanctions and COVID-19 Pandemic on Iranian Economy. International Academic Social Resources Journal, 6 (23), pp. 282-290. https://doi.org/10.31569/ASRJOURNAL.105.

Ustiashvili, S. (2023). Examining the Impact of Sanctions and the Aftermath of the JCPOA on Iran’s Economy. Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities, 2 (8), pp. 19–31. https://doi.org/10.56397/JRSSH.2023.08.04. https://elibrary.ru/ivmuyz.

Belyaev, S. A., Zyukin, D. A. (2022). Reducing import dependence as one of the parameters for ensuring Russia's economic security. Bulletin of the Kursk State Agricultural Academy, (3), 181–187. https://elibrary.ru/iawzlv.

Popov, V. V., Tsypin, A. P., Ovsyannikov, V. A. (2016). Agricultural imports as a threat to Russia's food security. In A. A. Sukiasyan (Ed.), Integration of science, society, production and industry: Collection of articles from the International Scientific and Practical Conference, pp. 43–48. https://elibrary.ru/whjuoh.

Litvinova, A. V., Loginova, E. V. (2023). Assessment of Import Dependence of the Russian Economy. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika [Journal of Volgograd State University. Economics], 25 (4), pp. 17–29. https://doi.org/10.15688/ek.jvolsu.2023.4.2. https://elibrary.ru/smyhwk.

Lakin, A. A. (2024). Approaches to assessing innovative projects within the framework of import substitution programs. The Eurasian Scientific Journal, 16 (3). https://elibrary.ru/ppyxsg.

Kheifets, B. A., Chernova, V. Y. (2019). System for assessing the effectiveness and monitoring the results of import substitution policy. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 15 (4), pp. 1266–1278. https://doi.org/10.17059/2019-4-23. https://elibrary.ru/kfryah.

Moiseev, N. A., Akhmadeev, B. A. (2021). Algorithm for assessing import substitution based on input-output tables. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 18 (3), pp. 117–129. https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2021-3-117-129. https://elibrary.ru/uwpeoq.

Borisov, V. N., Pochukaeva, O. V. (2019). The method of estimation of import substitution process at the Russian investment equipment market and its statistical assurance. Vestnik NSUEM, (3), pp. 94–108. https://doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2019-3-094-108. https://elibrary.ru/gzpdbv.

Mityakov, S. N., Mityakova, O. I., Usacheva, Y. V. (2013). The methodology of evaluation the import substitution in different industry branches. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, (4), pp. 19–23. https://elibrary.ru/rrukgt.

Bannikov, S. A. (2024). Enterprise management in the context of digitalization – the feasibility of implementing digital solutions in the mirror of statistics. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, (6), pp. 190–199. https://doi.org/10.47475/1994-2796-2024-488-6-190-199. https://elibrary.ru/dihcfu.

Amelin, S. V., Savvateev, V. A., Shendrikova, O. O., Golub, N. N. (2021). Methodology for assessing the effectiveness of import-substituting innovations. FES: Finance. Economy. Strategy, 18 (5), pp. 44–50. https://elibrary.ru/ynhvzk.

Tsapenko, M. V. (2018). Construction of effective fronts of innovative projects. Ontology of Designing, 8 (4), pp. 605–614. https://doi.org/10.18287/2223-9537-2018-8-4-605-614. https://elibrary.ru/yswnnb.

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

REGIONAL INDUSTRY IMPORT SUBSTITUTION INNOVATION PROJECTS EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT. (2026). Municipality: Economics and Management, 1, 44-56. https://municipality.owebs.ru/article/view/1742