PARTICIPATORY FORMS OF PUBLICE IMPACT ON LOCAL AUTHORITIES IN RUSSIA
Keywords:
Civic involvement, municipal government, participatory democracy, citizen surveys, public hearingsAbstract
Introduction. The article deals with the local participatory democracy in Russia. The relevance of the research topic is due to the fact that the referendum and the other mechanisms of direct democracy are used quite rarely (and, may be, can`t be applied more often), and are not capable to guarantee the expression of the population will for all meaningful reasons. The citizen consultations could lead to more frequent citizen participation in public affairs, but they have no binding force. That is why it is necessary to investigate the opportunities for citizens to influence the government by those consultations.
The scientific novelty of the research lies in the attempt to find the conditions and the reasons why municipal officials take into account the results of citizen consultations when making decisions.
Materials and methods. The empirical basis of the study is formed by the practice of the citizen consultations on local affaires, such as the citizen surveys and the public consultations. The author examines those mechanisms basing on the content analysis of federal legislation, as well as municipal legal acts and judicial practice. The analysis included 5 % of all the municipal legal acts on the local surveys publishing in the Federal Register of Municipal Legal acts as October 5, 2025. The information about the surveys published on the official websites of the administrative centers of the federal districts of Russia as October 10, 2025 have been analyzed as well.
Results and conclusions. As a result of the study, conclusions have been drawn on the role of citizen surveys in municipal legal acts and their implementation practices. Analysis of federal legislation on public hearings and municipal legal acts on local citizen surveys shows that, those forms are considered by the municipal authorities as a mechanism of revealing the will of the population and legitimation of local government decisions.
However, the analysis of the judicial practice on public hearings demonstrates that, sometimes the result public hearings is falsified.
The analysis of the local citizen surveys shows that, the aim of the majority of surveys is to get from citizens some information, but although there is a practice of using surveys as a mechanism of expression of the population`s will. Basing on this, the surveys can be divided into two categories: those that are voting for or against a particular project, and those that aim to identify the preferences of respondents.
Discussion. This article presents that the local surveys are used by local authorities for legitimate those decisions and, for this aim, are positioned as a mechanism of expression of the population will, even if in accordance with the law the citizen surveys are the optional consultative form of public participation. The question arises why municipal officials are doing something they are not obligated to do.
The author suggests that citizen surveys should play a much more significant role in municipal practice than is required by the law, as they partially substitute for local referendums. The study draws a conclusion that in Russian municipalities, there is a concept of the supremacy of the general will of the people (understood as the opinion of the majority of citizens). However, this concept is accepted only if citizen`s view does not seem unreasonable.
Downloads
References
Климчук Е. С., Павлов Н. В. Местный референдум как форма реализации права граждан Российской Федерации на местное самоуправление // Наукосфера. 2024. № 4-1. С. 373–377. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.10973601. EDN QHAAVV.
Шамхалова А. Б. Местный референдум как форма непосредственного осуществления населением местного самоуправления // Закон и право. 2025. № 6. С. 146–149. DOI 10.24412/2073-3313-2025-6-146-149. EDN TZRRRU.
Хамидуллина Е. Э. Местный референдум в решении вопросов местного значения: законодательство и практика // Международный журнал гуманитарных и естественных наук. 2021. № 11-1 (62). С. 184–187. DOI 10.24412/2500-1000-2021-11-1-184-187. EDN UKDBHE.
Павлов С. Ю. Местный референдум как основная форма народовластия: проблемы и перспективы // Вопросы российского и международного права. 2021. Т. 11, № 9A. С. 171–176. DOI 10.34670/AR.2021.35.19.020. EDN VUJBNE.
Шишкина А. Р. Проблемы реализации права на местный референдум // Скиф. Вопросы студенческой науки. 2024. № 1 (89). С. 302–305. EDN RJQLTA.
Белоусова Е. В. Местный референдум как форма непосредственной демократии: проблемы востребованности и перспективы // Право и государство: теория и практика. 2023. № 10 (226). С. 113–115. DOI 10.47643/1815-1337_2023_10_113. EDN LDXKMD.
Кожевников О. А. Участие населения в принятии и реализации программных документов муниципальных образований // Конституционное и муниципальное право. 2022. № 9. С. 60–64. DOI 10.18572/1812-3767-2022-9-60-64. EDN AUQWZP.
Максимов М. В. Роль непосредственной демократии в местном самоуправлении в РФ // Государственное и муниципальное управление. Ученые записки. 2023. № 2. С. 309–314. DOI 10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-2-309-314. EDN BPUGYN.
Казанцева О. Л. Проблемы и перспективы участия граждан в местном самоуправлении в условиях меняющегося законодательства // Российско-азиатский правовой журнал. 2025. № 2. С. 42–46. DOI 10.14258/ralj (2025)2.6. EDN DMASWV.
Итиуридзе Л. А. Социальные практики России – основа модернизации политического управления // Обозреватель. 2024. № 6 (407). С. 82–94. DOI 10.48137/2074-2975_2024_6_82. EDN PNGTNR.
Черкасов А. И. Партисипативная демократия и её формы на местном уровне в европейских странах // Сравнительное конституционное обозрение. 2021. № 6 (145). С. 15–33. DOI 10.21128/1812-7126-2021-6-15-33. EDN HZOPWH.
Hill L. La jurisprudence et la démocratie participative. Lex Electronica. 2024. 29 (1). Pр. 32–67. DOI 10.7202/1115069ar. EDN WDAWOL.
Au-Yong-Oliveira M. Leadership, Democracy and Participation // Journal: ICIEMC Proceedings. 2024. № 6. Pр. 191–204. DOI 10.34624/ICIEMC.V0I5.39519 201.
Журавлева Т. А. Право на город: российские практики работы с местными сообществами // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 21: Управление (государство и общество). 2021. № 4. С. 34–48. EDN WHEFBK.
Сушильников И. С. Право на партнерство между предпринимателями и органами власти в России // Российский юридический журнал. 2022. № 6. С. 117–134. DOI 10.34076/20713797_2022_6_117. EDN ITNMHU.
Lock O., Pettit C. Social media as passive geo-participation in transportation planning – how effective are topic modeling & sentiment analysis in comparison with citizen surveys? // Geo-Spatial Information Science. 2020. № 23 (4). Pр. 275–292. DOI 10.1080/10095020.2020.1815596. EDN BPBHKH.
Hjortskov M. Priming and Context Effects in Citizen Satisfaction Surveys // Public Administration. 2017. № 95 (4). Pр. 912–926. DOI 10.1111/padm.12346.
Agerberg M. Corrupted Estimates? Response Bias in Citizen Surveys on Corruption // Polit Behav. 2022. № 44. Pр. 653–678. DOI 10.1007/s11109-020-09630-5. EDN WRWKNE.
Hjortskov M., Andersen S. C., Jakobsen M. Encouraging Political Voices of Underrepresented Citizens through Coproduction: Evidence from a Randomized Field Trial // American Journal of Political Science. 2018. № 62 (3). Pр. 597–609. DOI 10.1111/ajps.12360.
Trautendorfer J., Schmidthuber L., Hilgers D. (2023). Surveys under the lens: how public administration research can benefit from citizen survey data // International Journal of Public Opinion Research. № 35 (3). Pр. 1–11. DOI 10.1093/ijpor/edad019. EDN VDAJWV.
Елистратова О. В., Ганина О. Р., Сеидов Ш. Г. Публичные слушания как консультативная форма // Известия высших учебных заведений. Поволжский регион. Общественные науки. 2025. № 2 (74). С. 69–78. DOI 10.21685/2072-3016-2025-2-6. EDN SUHVBO.
Mellado-González H. P. El sistema constitucional y el derecho a la informacion. Un analisis sistemico // Estudios En Derecho a La Informacion. 2024. 9 (18). Pр. 37–54. DOI 10.22201/iij.25940082e.2024.18.18733.
Soto Guerrero H. E., Uvalle Berrones R. Distorsión del derecho de acceso a la informacion publica. Estudios En Derecho a La Informacion. 2024. № 9 (18). Pр. 97–127. DOI 10.22201/iij.25940082e.2024.18.18950. EDN CZGBDJ.
Denolle A.-S., Duval E. Urbanisme et participation // Cahiers de la recherche sur les droits fondamentaux [En ligne]. 2016. № 14. Pр. 31–39. DOI 10.4000/crdf.585.
Houllier-Guibert C.-E. Evolution de la communication territoriale : les limites de l'idéologie de la proximité // Les Enjeux de l'information et de la communication. 2009. Vol. 1. Pр. 45–61. DOI 10.3917/enic.009.0045.
Сонина Е. О. Институализация участия населения в государственном управлении: анализ российских практик // Социально-политические исследования. 2022. № 4 (17). С. 18–33. DOI 10.20323/2658-428X-2022-4-17-18-33. EDN NBWRBR.
Астафьева И. А., Ященко И. С. Опрос граждан как вспомогательная форма участия населения в осуществлении местного самоуправления // Вестник ГГУ. 2024. № 3. С. 228–235. EDN QKQPJI.
Заборова Е. Н. К вопросу о массовости гражданского участия в управлении муниципальными образованиями // Муниципалитет: экономика и управление. 2025. № 1 (50). С. 12–20. EDN VFRWXI.
Уваров А. А. Микродемократические формы участия граждан в осуществлении местного самоуправления // Местное право. 2014. № 5. С. 15–20. EDN UGUNCD.
Трофимов М. С. Рекомендательный и обязательный характер мнения населения, выявленного органами местного самоуправления на основе проведения публичных слушаний и опросов граждан // Северо-Кавказский юридический вестник. 2009. № 1. С. 70–74. EDN RSQJIL.
Klimchuk, E. S., Pavlov, N. V. (2024). Local referendum as a form of realization of the right of citizens of the Russian Federation to local self-government. Naukosfera, (4-1), pp. 373–377. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10973601. https://elibrary.ru/qhaavv.
Shamhalova, A. B. (2025) Local referendum as a form of direct implementation of local self-government by the population. Statute and Law, (6), pp. 146–149. https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-3313-2025-6-146-149. https://elibrary.ru/tzrrru.
Hamidullina, E. Je. (2021) Local referendum in resolution of issues of local importance: legislation and practice. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences, (11-1), pp. 184–187. https://doi.org/10.24412/2500-1000-2021-11-1-184-187. https://elibrary.ru/ukdbhe.
Pavlov, S. Ju. (2021) Local referendum as the main form of democracy: problems and prospects. Matters of Russian and International Law, 11 (9A), pp. 171–176. https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2021.35.19.020. https://elibrary.ru/vujbne.
Shishkina, A. R. (2024) Problems of implementing the right to a local referendum. Skiff, (1), pp. 302–305. https://elibrary.ru/rjqlta.
Belousova, E. V. (2023) Local referendum as form of direct democracy: problems of relevance and prospects. Law and state: theory and practice, (10), pp. 113–115. https://doi.org/10.47643/1815-1337_2023_10_113. https://elibrary.ru/ldxkmd.
Kozhevnikov, O. A. (2022) Involvement of the population in adoption and implementation of policy documents of municipal structures. Constitutional and Municipal Law, (9), pp. 60–64. https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3767-2022-9-60-64. https://elibrary.ru/auqwzp.
Maksimov, M. V. (2023) The role of direct democracy in local self-government in the Russian Federation. State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes, (2), pp. 309–314. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-2-309-314. https://elibrary.ru/bpugyn.
Kazanceva, O. L. (2025) Problems and prospects of citizens' participation in local government in the context of changing legislation. Russian-Asian Law Journal, (2), pp. 42–46. https://doi.org/10.14258/ralj (2025)2.6. https://elibrary.ru/dmaswv.
Itiuridze, L. A. (2024) Social practices in Russia as the basis for the modernization of political governance. Observer, (6), pp. 82–94. https://doi.org/10.48137/2074-2975_2024_6_82. https://elibrary.ru/pngtnr.
Cherkasov, A. I. (2021) Participatory democracy and its forms at the local level in European countries. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie (Comparative Constitutional Review), (6), pp. 15–33. https://doi.org/10.21128/1812-7126-2021-6-15-33. https://elibrary.ru/hzopwh.
Hill, L. (2024) Jurisprudence and participatory democracy. Lex Electronica, 29 (1), pp. 32–67. https://doi.org/10.7202/1115069ar. https://elibrary.ru/wdawol.
Au-Yong-Oliveira, M. (2024) Leadership, Democracy and Participation. Journal: ICIEMC Proceedings, (6), pp. 191–204. https://doi.org/10.34624/ICIEMC.V0I5.39519.
Zhuravleva, T. A. (2021) The right to the city: Russian practices of working with local communities. Lomonosov Public Administration Journal. Series 21, (4), pp. 34–48. https://elibrary.ru/whefbk.
Sushil'nikov, I. S. (2022) The right to a partnership between entrepreneurs and authorities in Russia. In Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal, (6), pp. 117–134. https://doi.org/10.34076/20713797_2022_6_117. https://elibrary.ru/itnmhu.
Lock, O., Pettit, C. (2020) Social media as passive geo-participation in transportation planning – how effective are topic modeling & sentiment analysis in comparison with citizen surveys? Geo-Spatial Information Science, 23 (4), pp. 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2020.1815596. https://elibrary.ru/bpbhkh.
Hjortskov, M. (2017) Priming and Context Effects in Citizen Satisfaction Surveys. Public Administration, 95 (4), pp. 912–926. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12346.
Agerberg, M. (2022) Corrupted Estimates? Response Bias in Citizen Surveys on Corruption. Political behavior, 44 (2), pp. 653–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09630-5. https://elibrary.ru/wrwkne.
Hjortskov, M., Andersen, C., Jakobsen, M. (2018) Encouraging Political Voices of Underrepresented Citizens through Coproduction: Evidence from a Randomized Field Trial. American Journal of Political Science, 62 (3), pp. 597–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12360.
Trautendorfer, J., Schmidthuber, L., Hilgers, D. (2023) Surveys Under the Lens: How Public Administration Research Can Benefit from Citizen Survey Data. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 35 (3). https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edad019. https://elibrary.ru/vdajwv.
Elistratova, O. V., Ganina, O. R, Seidov, Sh. G. (2025) The public hearings as an advisory form of democracy. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Povolzhskiy region. Obshchestvennye nauki = University proceedings. Volga region. Social sciences, (2), pp. 69–78. https://doi.org/10.21685/2072-3016-2025-2-6. https://elibrary.ru/suhvbo.
Mellado-Gonzalez, H. P. (2024) El sistema constitucional y el derecho a la informacion. Un analisis sistemico. Estudios En Derecho a La Informacion, 9 (18), pp. 37–54. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.25940082e.2024.18.18733.
Soto Guerrero, H. E., Uvalle Berrones, R. (2024) Distorsion del derecho de acceso a la informacion publica. Estudios En Derecho a La Informacion, 9 (18), pp. 97–127. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.25940082e.2024.18.18950.
Denolle, A.-S., Duval, E. (2016) Urban planning and participation. Research notebooks on fundamental rights, (14), pp. 31–39. https://doi.org/10.4000/crdf.585.
Houllier-Guibert, C.-E. (2009) Evolution of Regional Communication: The Limits of Ideology of Proximity. Journal in Information and communication sciences, (1), pp. 45–61. https://doi.org/10.3917/enic.009.0045.
Sonina, E. O. (2022) Institutionalization of population participation in public administration: analysis of Russian practices. Social and Political Research, (4), pp. 18–33. https://doi.org/10.20323/2658-428X-2022-4-17-18-33. https://elibrary.ru/nbwrbr.
Astaf'eva, I. A., Jashhenko, I. S. (2024) Citizen survey as an auxiliary form of public participation in the implementation of local self-government. Vestnik GSU, (3), pp. 228–235. https://elibrary.ru/qkqpji.
Zaborova, E. N. (2025) Civic involvement in the municipalities management. Municipality: Economics and Management, (1), pp. 12–20. https://elibrary.ru/vfrwxi.
Uvarov, A. A. (2014) Microdemocratic forms of citizen participation in the implementation of local self-government. Local law, (5), pp. 15–20. https://elibrary.ru/uguncd.
Trofimov, M. S. (2009) The recommendatory and obligatory character of the population opinion, revealed by the bodies of self-government on the basis of the conducting hearings and polls of the citizens. North Caucasus Legal Vestnik, (1), pp. 70–74. https://elibrary.ru/rsqjil.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Municipality: economics and management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
