Ecosystem digital interactions transactional value

Authors

  • Евгений Васильевич Попов Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации, Уральский институт управления Автор https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5513-5020 (unauthenticated)
  • Виктория Львовна Симонова Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации, Уральский институт управления Автор https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2814-464X (unauthenticated)
  • Елена Вячеславовна Ли Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации, Уральский институт управления Автор https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0604-1802 (unauthenticated)

Keywords:

Business ecosystems, transactional value, digital interactions, platform ecosystems, digital transformation, transaction cost theory

Abstract

Introduction. The rapid digital transformation necessitates a revision of traditional approaches to business ecosystem management. This study develops a concept of transactional value in digital ecosystem interactions, aiming at systematizing value creation, distributing and accumulating processes within business ecosystems. The paper analyzes conventional ecosystem management approaches focused primarily on transaction cost minimization, while advocating for a transition to a value-oriented paradigm. The scientific contribution lies in developing the concept of transactional value for digital ecosystem interactions, which advances the economic theory of transaction valuation in ecosystem contexts.

Materials and methods. The research employs systemic logical analysis methodology, incorporating: critical examination of classical transaction cost theories (R. Coase, O. Williamson); systemization of contemporary approaches to digital interaction valuation; comparative analysis of various business ecosystem types; development of an original three-component transactional value model.

The empirical foundation comprises case studies of leading ecosystems and data from peer-reviewed articles indexed in Science Direct, ResearchGate, and E-Library databases.

Results and conclusions. The study reveals the following: 1) transactional value in ecosystem interactions constitutes a dynamic, multi-level outcome encompassing not only direct financial benefits but also intangible assets (trust, reputation, data capital, synergy effects, and network externalities) that collectively ensure ecosystem sustainability; 2) classical transaction cost theories require substantial adaptation to digital economy realities, where strategic value structure optimization and equitable value redistribution among participants supersede mere cost minimization as primary objectives; 3) the proposed conceptual framework addresses limitations of traditional models by providing analytical tools for comprehensive ecosystem efficiency assessment.

Discussion. The study develops further economic ecosystem theory through its novel transactional value framework, integrating tangible benefits, intangible assets, and emergent properties. The proposed approach transcends conventional models by systematically capturing digital interaction synergies.

The research acknowledges contextual limitations regarding value evolution across ecosystem lifecycles and regulatory impacts. Promising avenues for further investigation include: developing industry-specific valuation metrics; examining value dynamics under external shocks (technological, geopolitical); conducting typological comparisons of ecosystem architectures.

Implementation requires interdisciplinary collaboration among economists, data analysts, and domain experts to operationalize the framework for strategic decision-making.

Received: 10 June 2025 · Revised: 9 July 2025 · Accepted: 3 September 2025

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Евгений Васильевич Попов, Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации, Уральский институт управления

    Попов Евгений Васильевич – доктор экономических наук, доктор физико-математических наук; Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации, Уральский институт управления (620144, Россия, г. Екатеринбург, ул. 8 Марта, д. 66) – директор центра социально-экономических исследований УИУ РАНХиГС, член-корреспондент Российской академии наук, заслуженный деятель науки Российской Федерации

  • Виктория Львовна Симонова , Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации, Уральский институт управления

    Симонова Виктория Львовна – кандидат экономических наук; Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации, Уральский институт управления (620144, Россия, г. Екатеринбург, ул. 8 Марта, д. 66) – заместитель центра социально-экономических исследований

  • Елена Вячеславовна Ли, Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации, Уральский институт управления

    Ли Елена Вячеславовна – Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации, Уральский институт управления – аспирант 

References

Попов Е. В., Веретенникова А. Ю., Комарова О. В.,

Кох И. А., Семячков К. А., Селезнева Д. А., Симонова В. Л., Федореев С. А., Челак И. П., Черепанов В. В. Экономические экосистемы. Москва : НИЦ

ИНФРА-М, 2024. 356 с. DOI 10.12737/2162080. EDN

AZNGPD.

Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Chang. Cambridge, Mass. : The Belknap Press

of Harvard University Press, 1982. – 454 p. – ISBN

0-674-27228-5.

Baldwin C. Y., Woodard C. J. The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View // Harvard Business School Finance Working Paper No. 09-034. P. 32 с. 2008. DOI

10.4337/9781849803311.00008.

Jacobides M. G., Cennamo C., Gawer A. Towards a theory

of ecosystems // Strategic Management Journal. 2018.

Vol. 39, no. 8. P. 2255–2276. DOI 10.2139/ssrn.3218233.

Teece D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature

and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance // Strategic Management Journal. 2007. Т. 28.

Р. 1319–1350. DOI 10.1002/smj.640.

Кулапов М. Н., Переверзева Е. И., Кириллова О. Ю. Бизнес-экосистемы: определения, типологии,

практики развития // Вопросы инновационной экономики. 2022. Т. 12, № 3. С. 1597–1612. DOI 10.18334/

vinec.12.3.115234. EDN RLKOFE.

Шишкин А. Н. Перспективы и тенденции развития экосистем в РФ // Экономика. 2023. Т. 11, № 6. С. 57–61.

DOI 10.12737/2587-9111-2023-11-6-57-61. EDN KTRNYT.

Бушуева М. А., Масюк Н. Н., Брагина З. В., Богомолов А. А. Роль бизнес-экосистем в формировании экосистемы экономики региона // Вестник Алтайской

академии экономики и права. 2022. № 12-2. С. 203–

DOI 10.17513/vaael.2639. EDN PHSGUQ.

Ратушняк Е. С., Шаповалов В. В. Концепция экосистемы в экономике и управлении: систематический

обзор // Российский внешнеэкономический вестник.

2025. № 3. С. 49–65. DOI 10.24412/2072-8042-2025-

3-49-65. EDN ULXGFE.

Coase Р. H. The Nature of the Firm // Economica. 1937.

Т. 4, № 16. С. 386–405. DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.

tb00002.x.

Williamson O. E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting // Kapitel I – Führung und Organisation. 1985. P. 61–75. DOI

10.1007/978-3-8349-9320-5_6.

Gawer A., Phillips N. Institutional Work as Logics

Shift: The Case of Intel’s Transformation to Platform

Leader // Organization Studies. 2013. 34 (8). DOI

10.1177/0170840613492071.

Adner R. Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy // Journal of Management. 2016.

43 (1), рр. 39–58. DOI 10.1177/0149206316678451.

Jacobides M. G., Cennamo C., Gawer A. Towards a theory

of ecosystems // Strategic Management Journal. 2018.

Vol. 39, no. 8. P. 2255–2276. DOI 10.2139/ssrn.3218233.

Zajac E. J., Olsen C. P. From Transaction Cost to Transaction Value Analysis // Strategic Management Journal.

1993. 30 (1), pp. 131–145. DOI 10.1002/smj.4250140303.

EDN EPXGXB.

North D. C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance // Cambridge University Press.

1990. DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511808678.

Masten S. E. Case studies in contracting and organization // Oxford University Press. 1996.

Furubotn E. G., Richter R. Institutions and economic theory: The contribution of the new institutional economics // University of Michigan Press. 2005. DOI

10.3998/mpub.6715.

Rochet J.-C., Tirole J. Platform Competition in

Two-Sided Markets // Journal of the European Economic Association. 2003. 1 (4), pp. 990–1029. DOI

10.1162/154247603322493212.

Branchik B., Shaw E. Net Transaction Value: A Model of

High-Involvement Decision-Making in Buyer Choice Behavior // Journal of Historical Research in Marketing.

2015.

Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior // Organizational

Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991. 50 (2).

P. 179–211. DOI 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.

Gigerenzer G., Gaissmaier W. Heuristic decision making //

Annual Review of Psychology. 2011. (62), pp. 451–482.

DOI 10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346.

Stary C. Transactional value analytics in organizational

development // Analytics and Knowledge Management.

2019. 30 p. DOI 10.1201/9781315209555-8.

Фролов Д. П. Постинституциональная теория блокчейна // Журнал экономической теории. 2019. Т. 16,

№ 2. С. 262–278. DOI 10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-

2.8. EDN MEMKDT.

Фролов Д. П. Постинституционализм: за пределами

институционального мейнстрима // Вопросы экономики. 2020. Т. 22, № 2. С. 185–202. DOI 10.32609/0042-

8736-2020-5-107-140. EDN PUQUNT.

Фролов Д. П. От трансакционных издержек – к трансакционной ценности: преодолевая фрикционную парадигму // Вопросы экономики. 2020. № 8. С. 51–81.

DOI 10.32609/0042-8736-2020-8-51-81. EDN ZXRBMY.

Popov, E. V., Veretennikova, A. Yu., Komarova, O. V., Kokh, I. A.,

Semyachkov, K. A., Selezneva, D. A., Simonova, V. L., Fedoreev, S. A., Chelak, I. P., Cherepanov, V. V. (2024) Economic

ecosystems. Moscow, NIC INFRA-M, 356 p. https://doi.

org/10.12737/2162080. https://elibrary.ru/azngpd.

2. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary

Theory of Economic Change. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://inctpped.ie.ufrj.br/spiderweb/pdf_2/Dosi_1_An_evolutionary-theory-of_economic_change..pdf

Balwin, C. Y., Woodard, C. J. (2008) The Architecture of

Platforms: A Unified View. Harvard Business School Finance Working Paper, no. 09-034. https://doi.org/10.43

37/9781849803311.00008.

Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., Gawer, A. (2018) Towards

a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal,

39 (8). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904.

Teece, D. J. (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the

nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise

performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (13),

pp. 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640.

Kulapov, M. N., Pereverzeva, E. I., Kirillova, O. Yu. (2022)

Business ecosystems: definitions, typologies, development practices. Russian journal of innovation economics, 12 (3), pp. 1597–1612. https://doi.org/10.18334/

vinec.12.3.115234. https://elibrary.ru/rlkofe.

Shishkin, A. N. (2023) Prospects and Trends for Ecosystems Development in the RF. Scientific Research and

Development. Economics, 11 (6), pp. 57–61. https://doi.

org/10.12737/2587-9111-2023-11-6-57-61. https://elibrary.ru/ktrnyt.

Bushueva, M. A., Masyuk, N. N., Bragina, Z. V., Bogomolov,

A. A. (2022) The role of business ecosystems in forming

the ecosystem of the regional economy. Vestnik Altajskoj akademii ekonomiki i prava, (12-2), pp. 203–209.

https://doi.org/10.17513/vaael.2639. https://elibrary.

ru/phsguq.

Ratushnyak, E. S., Shapovalov, V. V. (2025) The ecosystem concept in economics and management: a systematic review. Russian Foreign Economic Journal, (3),

pp. 49–65. https://doi.org/10.24412/2072-8042-2025-

3-49-65. https://elibrary.ru/ulxgfe.

Coase, Р. H. (1937) The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4, (16), pp. 386–405. https://doi.

org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x.

Williamson, O. E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of

Capitalism. Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. Kapitel I – Führung und Organisation, pp. 61–75. https://doi.

org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9320-5_6.

Gawer, A., Phillips, N. (2013) Institutional Work as Logics Shift: The Case of Intel’s Transformation to Platform Leader. Organization Studies, 34 (8). https://doi.

org/10.1177/0170840613492071.

Adner, R. (2016) Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable

Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management, 43 (1).

https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451.

Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., Gawer, A. (2018) Towards

a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal,

39 (8). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904.

15. Zajac, E. J., Olsen, C. P. (1993) From Transaction Cost

to Transaction Value Analysis. Strategic Management

Journal, 30 (1), pp. 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/

smj.4250140303. https://elibrary.ru/epxgxb.

North, D. C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and

Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678.

Masten, S. E. (1996) Case studies in contracting and organization. Oxford University Press.

Furubotn, E. G., Richter, R. (2005) Institutions and economic theory: The contribution of the new institutional

economics. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.

org/10.3998/mpub.6715.

Rochet, J.-C., Tirole, J. (2003) Platform Competition

in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1 (4), pp. 990–1029. https://doi.

org/10.1162/154247603322493212.

Branchik, B., Shaw, E. (2015) Net Transaction Value: A

Model of High-Involvement Decision-Making in Buyer

Choice Behavior. Journal of Historical Research in Marketing, 7 (3), pp. 372–392.

Ajzen, I. (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), pp. 179–211. https://doi.

org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.

Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W. (2011) Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, (62), pp. 451–482. https://doi.org/10.1146/

annurev-psych-120709-145346.

Stary, C. (2019) Transactional value analytics in organizational development. Analytics and Knowledge Management, 30 p. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315209555-8.

Frolov, D. P. (2019) Post-institutional theory of blockchain. Journal of Economic Theory, 16 (2), pp. 262–278.

https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-2.8.

https://elibrary.ru/memkdt.

Frolov, D. P. (2020) Methodological Foundations behind

Modern Approaches to the Spatial Distribution of Economic Resources in Russia. AlterEconomics, 22 (2), pp.

185–202. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-

5-107-140. https://elibrary.ru/puqunt.

Frolov, D. P. (2020) From transaction costs to transaction value: overcoming the frictional paradigm.

Voprosy Ekonomiki, (8), pp. 51–81. https://doi.

org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-8-51-81. https://elibrary.ru/zxrbmy.

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Ecosystem digital interactions transactional value. (2025). Municipality: Economics and Management, 3. https://municipality.owebs.ru/article/view/1723